September 30 2010 by
Hershel C. Johnson, Trenton, Retired Missionary
For the last year after
Jerry Rankin announced his retirement, we have read a similar statement to the
one printed in the Sept. 25
Biblical Recorder. This one is a quote from trustee
chairman Jimmy Pritchard: “We have one purpose and that is to find God’s man.”
Since our greatest single
mission offering each year is named for a woman and since at any given time of
any year more women serve on the foreign field than men, one wonders about this
automatic exclusion. May we receive the New Testament references for this?
Hershel C. Johnson
Trenton
Retired Missionary
9/30/2010 8:31:00 AM by
Hershel C. Johnson, Trenton, Retired Missionary | with
5 comments
September 22 2010 by
Bryan Thompson, Mount Airy, N.C.
One thing I have often
observed and wondered about in my 10 years as a Southern Baptist is this: why
is it that anytime we elect someone to a denominational leadership
position, the first thing that people start griping about is that person’s
(or the church’s) giving record to the Cooperative Program (CP)? I
hear it just about every time a state or national convention comes
around.
And now, the North American
Mission Board presidential search committee is recommending someone whose
church has reportedly given millions to Great Commission efforts around
the world (according to the trustee chairman’s letter), and it’s the same old
rigmarole: “Well, they could have given more” or “More should have been
funneled through the CP.”
Is CP giving by
itself really that important a criterion? Could this be one of the reasons
why some younger pastors are reconsidering their relationship with the
SBC? As a young pastor myself, I just don’t get it.
Bryan Thompson
Mount Airy, N.C.
9/22/2010 7:08:00 AM by
Bryan Thompson, Mount Airy, N.C. | with
19 comments
September 22 2010 by
Jack E Walters, Cramerton, N.C.
I do not agree with your
editorial on a mosque in Manhattan and I can see no benefit in your publishing
your beliefs on this issue in this space. Surely there are many other problems
in our world today that are not as controversial as this one. This is a state
of New York problem and has no direct impact on North Carolina.
Jack E Walters
Cramerton, N.C.
9/22/2010 7:07:00 AM by
Jack E Walters, Cramerton, N.C. | with
10 comments
September 22 2010 by
Billy Secrest, Dallas, N.C.
I pray you will reconsider
carrying the advertisement for “Nanny McPhee Returns,” which promotes
witchcraft and magic. Consider these verses:
2 Corinthians 6:14-16 — “For
what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has
light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what portion does a
believer share with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with
idols?”
1 John 2:15-16 — “Do not
love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love
of the Father is not in him.”
Please remember the request
of the people who come to your web site.
John 12:21 — “Sir, we wish
to see Jesus.”
1 John 2:26 — “I write these
things to you about those who are trying to deceive you.”
I will continue to pray that
the Lord Jesus Christ be glorified in whatever your decision will be.
Billy Secrest
Dallas, N.C.
9/22/2010 7:05:00 AM by
Billy Secrest, Dallas, N.C. | with
10 comments
September 22 2010 by
Bob Ferguson, High Point, N.C.
Great article! (BR, Aug.
28) Thanks for having the courage to speak the truth. It is right on
target and I hope that you don’t become a target for those who do not
understand our great liberties.
Bob Ferguson
High Point, N.C.
9/22/2010 7:03:00 AM by
Bob Ferguson, High Point, N.C. | with
4 comments
September 22 2010 by
Bob Ferguson, High Point, N.C.
Great article! (BR, Aug.
28) Thanks for having the courage to speak the truth. It is right on
target and I hope that you don’t become a target for those who do not
understand our great liberties.
Bob Ferguson
High Point, N.C.
9/22/2010 7:03:00 AM by
Bob Ferguson, High Point, N.C. | with
4 comments
September 8 2010 by
Beverly B. Cook, Wilkesboro, N.C.
Thank you so much for your
editorial (Mosque in Manhattan) in the
Biblical Recorder. I had about
given up that most Baptists knew how we stood on separation of church and
state.
We are a nation of diverse
and wonderful people. It does not say on the Statue of Liberty, “give me
your tired and hungry, only if you are Christian.” Thanks again for your
insight and courage to speak out.
Beverly B. Cook
Wilkesboro, N.C.
9/8/2010 5:47:00 AM by
Beverly B. Cook, Wilkesboro, N.C. | with
3 comments
September 8 2010 by
Beverly B. Cook, Wilkesboro, N.C.
Thank you so much for your
editorial (Mosque in Manhattan) in the
Biblical Recorder. I had about
given up that most Baptists knew how we stood on separation of church and
state.
We are a nation of diverse
and wonderful people. It does not say on the Statue of Liberty, “give me
your tired and hungry, only if you are Christian.” Thanks again for your
insight and courage to speak out.
Beverly B. Cook
Wilkesboro, N.C.
9/8/2010 5:47:00 AM by
Beverly B. Cook, Wilkesboro, N.C. | with
3 comments
September 8 2010 by
Ned L. Mathews, Youngsville, N.C.
In an editorial
dated August
23 (online), Norman Jameson asks a question concerning the issue in regard to the
proposed building of a mosque near the site of the Islamist terrorist act of
9/11.
And Jameson has the answer
for his question. He argues that the issue is that we (the 70 percent of
Americans who oppose the site of the mosque) “could not bear the insult . . .”
Insult? The destruction of
the north and south towers of the World Trade Center, the bombing of the
Pentagon, the destruction of the plane and its passengers who were destined to
destroy the White House, and the loss of more than 3,000 lives on that day of
infamy is an insult?
Scripture says “a person’s
wisdom makes him slow to anger and it is to his glory to overlook an offense”
(Prov. 19:11, NET) but the incredible carnage of 9/11 should be considered an
insult?
I find that incredibly
insensitive to all Americans and especially to those who lost loved ones on
that dreadful day.
And I have a question for
editor Jameson: Are you aware of a single Iman or any muslim leader in the U.S.
who condemned the terrorist act of 9/11? If so, let them build that mosque but
not at ground zero.
Ned L. Mathews
Youngsville, N.C.
9/8/2010 5:45:00 AM by
Ned L. Mathews, Youngsville, N.C. | with
5 comments
September 8 2010 by
Ned L. Mathews, Youngsville, N.C.
In an editorial
dated August
23 (online), Norman Jameson asks a question concerning the issue in regard to the
proposed building of a mosque near the site of the Islamist terrorist act of
9/11.
And Jameson has the answer
for his question. He argues that the issue is that we (the 70 percent of
Americans who oppose the site of the mosque) “could not bear the insult . . .”
Insult? The destruction of
the north and south towers of the World Trade Center, the bombing of the
Pentagon, the destruction of the plane and its passengers who were destined to
destroy the White House, and the loss of more than 3,000 lives on that day of
infamy is an insult?
Scripture says “a person’s
wisdom makes him slow to anger and it is to his glory to overlook an offense”
(Prov. 19:11, NET) but the incredible carnage of 9/11 should be considered an
insult?
I find that incredibly
insensitive to all Americans and especially to those who lost loved ones on
that dreadful day.
And I have a question for
editor Jameson: Are you aware of a single Iman or any muslim leader in the U.S.
who condemned the terrorist act of 9/11? If so, let them build that mosque but
not at ground zero.
Ned L. Mathews
Youngsville, N.C.
9/8/2010 5:45:00 AM by
Ned L. Mathews, Youngsville, N.C. | with
5 comments