fbpx
×

Log into your account

We have changed software providers for our subscription database. Old login credentials will no longer work. Please click the "Register" link below to create a new account. If you do not know your new account number you can contact [email protected]
Group: DADT repeal has harmed religious liberty
Edward Lee Pitts, Baptist Press
September 27, 2012
4 MIN READ TIME

Group: DADT repeal has harmed religious liberty

Group: DADT repeal has harmed religious liberty
Edward Lee Pitts, Baptist Press
September 27, 2012

WASHINGTON – One year after the military began allowing gay, lesbian and bisexual service members to openly proclaim their sexuality, some conservative groups continue to call for an end to the change in policy.

But their pleas are falling largely on deaf ears on Capitol Hill, where most lawmakers seem content to focus on other issues.

The Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty (CARL), which represents more than 2,000 chaplains serving the armed forces, said it is cataloging examples of negative consequences that have resulted from the repeal of the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. After Congress voted in December 2010 for repeal, White House and Pentagon officials set Sept. 20, 2011, as the official end date of the then-16-year-old policy that prevented homosexuals from serving openly in the military.

“The American armed forces exist to defend our nation, not as [a] social experiment lab in which our troops serve as human subjects,” said Ron Crews, a retired chaplain and colonel who now is with CARL. “While many will ignore the negative impacts or pretend that they don’t exist, threats to our troops’ freedom are mounting.”

Many media accounts focus on incidents against gay service members, but CARL points out the following incidents since the policy change:

– A chaplain was encouraged by military officials to resign his commission unless he could “get in line with the new policy.”

– A chaplain was threatened with early retirement and then was reassigned to be more “closely supervised” because he had expressed concerns about the policy change.

– A senior chaplain was stripped of his authority over the chapel under his charge because, in accordance with federal law, he proclaimed the chapel as a “sacred space” where marriage or marriage-like ceremonies would be between one man and one woman.

– Same-sex ceremonies have been performed at military chapels, including one at Fort Polk, La., a state that constitutionally defines marriage as being between one man and one woman.

“This list of problems and incidents that have arisen mere months after this administration imposed its will on the armed forces is disturbing to say the least, and we know it is only the beginning,” Crews said. “Compounding the outrage, service members are not free to speak out about these matters. This ensures that distrust in the ranks will increase and morale will decrease as the number of silenced victims grows.”

Republicans in the Senate on Sept. 11 introduced a bill protecting military chaplains from being forced to perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.

The measure, introduced by Sens. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., and Roger Wicker, R-Miss., also forbids the performance of marriage services for gay and lesbian couples on military bases.

The effort, similar to one introduced in the House earlier this year, is designed to reassert the authority of the Defense of Marriage Act in the aftermath of the ending of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell last year. The Department of Defense already has authorized chaplains to perform same-sex marriages on military bases in states that recognize such unions.

Some soldiers are fearful that the changing military culture could force conservative Christian denominations to withdraw their support for the chaplain program.

“This bill protects military chaplains from being forced to go against their conscience and religious beliefs in regard to this issue,” Inhofe said. “This is something the chaplains that serve this country need and deserve.”

While the House version to protect religious freedom passed earlier this summer, the Democratic-led Senate is not expected to approve the Senate bill.

In the House, many Republican lawmakers seem reluctant to continue fighting to overturn the repeal. House Armed Services Committee Chairman Howard “Buck” McKeon, R-Calif., told reporters in June that he considered the matter settled.

“We fought that fight,” McKeon said regarding failed efforts by Republicans to prevent the repeal. “That’s not something that I would personally bring up.”

Gays, lesbians, and bisexuals make up an estimated 2 percent of the 2.2 million service members on active duty and serving in the reserves or the National Guard.

(EDITOR’S NOTE – Edward Lee Pitts writes for World News Service, where this story first appeared.)

Related stories

Report: Restrictions on religious freedom increasing worldwide

Guest Column: How gay marriage harms religious liberty