fbpx
×

Log into your account

We have changed software providers for our subscription database. Old login credentials will no longer work. Please click the "Register" link below to create a new account. If you do not know your new account number you can contact [email protected]
Protestant, Catholic dividing lines examined
S. Craig Sanders, SBTS
November 02, 2016
5 MIN READ TIME

Protestant, Catholic dividing lines examined

Protestant, Catholic dividing lines examined
S. Craig Sanders, SBTS
November 02, 2016

With the approaching 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation, the need for clarity on the commonalities and differences between Catholics and Protestants grows ever more urgent, according to the authors of The Unfinished Reformation.

Gregg R. Allison, professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and Chris Castaldo, lead pastor of New Covenant Church, Naperville, Ill., provide a thorough and careful examination of the issues at stake. Both authors have experience with Catholicism: Allison served with CRU, formerly known as Campus Crusade for Christ, at Notre Dame and was a missionary to Italy, and Castaldo was raised Roman Catholic and later converted to evangelicalism.

“The spread of the Reformation has spawned five centuries of extraordinary innovation and flexibility, but it has also generated a considerable amount of religious instability and even division,” the authors write in the introduction. “Greater familiarity and affinity with the pope, cooperation on social issues, the charismatic renewal, missional ecumenism, formal religious dialogues, and development of doctrines … have all caused centuries of hostility to cool. But does this mean the Reformation is now finished?”

Allison and Castaldo identify the dividing lines between Protestants and Catholics as essentially the issues of authority and salvation. According to the authors, Catholics understand authority through the lens of a Christ-Church interconnection, in which the presence of Christ is expressed solely through the Roman Catholic Church, making it the only true church and thus the arbiter of the biblical canon and the mediator of salvific merits. And while Catholics and Protestants agree on the nature of salvation as Trinitarian, they disagree on whether salvation can be merited through the culmination of a righteous life or is wholly a free gift of God.

While expressing clear disagreement with Catholic doctrine on such issues as Scripture and interpretation, the role of Mary in the church, the nature of the sacraments and justification by faith alone, Allison and Castaldo preface their critique by honoring the personal and cosmic hope on which Protestants and Catholics stand together and the shared stream of historic confessions on the Triune God.

“We encourage our fellow Protestants to respect the Catholic Church as part of the Christian tradition, albeit one that contains serious error,” they write. “However, we should also acknowledge that for all its errors, it is categorically different from [theological] cults such as the Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses, which explicitly repudiate the creeds, the deity of Christ and other fundamentals of the Christian faith.”

Protestants and Catholics can also find agreement on theological issues in the public square, like vocal opposition to abortion and the changing sexual norms in society. Since religious liberty continues to be threatened, Allison and Castaldo point to the need for a renewed co-belligerence – public alliances between religious groups based on their shared concerns.

In an interview with the seminary's Southern News, Allison said it would nevertheless be unhelpful to disregard the standing differences between Catholics and Protestants. But Allison encourages open and honest dialogue to “learn more about one another's perspective, appreciate these points of commonality, and not fight against or kill one another as was being done in the 16th century.”

“If we don't understand truly what Catholics believe and what they engage in then we will find ourselves unjustly criticizing,” Allison said. “The notion, for example, that in the mass today Jesus will be crucified for the 2,349,737,014th time is a misunderstanding of Catholic theology. Catholics believe that Jesus Christ died once on the cross, that crucifixion is re-presented in the mass today but it's not another crucifixion; it's one death of Jesus Christ not locked in space and time but through the eternality and atemporality of God, this sacrifice becomes re-presented at the mass today.”

In the interview, Allison also noted the stumbling blocks to unity, particularly the doctrine of Mary and justification by faith alone. Allison said the doctrines of Mary's immaculate conception, perpetual virginity, and assumption into heaven, and her status as mother and teacher of the church derive from tradition rather than Scripture. Concerning justification, Allison said “the fundamental definition still divides us,” despite Pope Francis saying in June he agreed with Martin Luther.

“As Protestants, we believe that justification is a forensic act of God; it's a legal declaration,” Allison said. “God declares sinners not guilty because of the forgiveness they receive in Jesus Christ and totally righteous before God, not because they are righteous or have any inherent righteousness in themselves, but because the righteousness of Jesus Christ is imputed or credited to their account.”

The Unfinished Reformation: What Unites and Divides Catholics and Protestants After 500 Years was published in September by Zondervan and can be purchased online or in LifeWay Stores for $16.99.

(EDITOR’S NOTE – S. Craig Sanders is manager of news and information at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.)